New Baby Congratulations Sentences In English

Mullion, wikipedia, false

Here Does "Mullion" writes about the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights"

"But the declaration of human rights, these are only individual rights or the moral faculty require the right thing. Therein lies the problem: it gives man the moral right to demand one thing right, that right thing is not defined by reference to the law (jus) and therefore the divine law, but ... in reference to other men and society. Scrutator As stated, this is how it comes in the name of "human rights" to justify abortion, euthanasia, "marriage" homosexual, etc.. "

Really? A bill of rights became law only establishes the rights of creditors with only subjective and no debtor?

About" theology individual, "probably could I write" individual moral theology. "That is the moral theology as it considers the acts of the individual, it opposes law, which is a social science ( on the relations between at least two individuals).

course I maintain that the post Blamont is a fake. It publishes a reference anywhere to what it claims to be a Mosaic law. Moses would have warranted the death penalty for child rape. So I claim a biblical reference in order to discuss it. But Blamout gave references unrelated to his first statement.

I am still accused of wrong when I wrote that I did not know if the room had beige published my comment. It seems that since "Jan Michael", without publication of my commentary, criticized by invoking the policy of the Pope (well, policy that lends to the pope). I asked him just yet clear that "Civitas" was a "transmission belt" of the "Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X." (SSPX), which is the least we can do when we speak of this pseudo-movement. Moreover, it seems that the answer of "Jan Michael" was published in response to my post, but my comment was simply ignored.

I accuse obviously not "all" false. I had not seen that PEB had simply copied the "translation" of wikipedia (a fake, as is not disputed by Mullion), I therefore withdraw the charge of "false", but the use, especially after my post is no longer in doubt.

When using Wikipedia, it must be wary. Wikipedia articles are often written by non-Catholics. About Paul IV, it is claimed that it (death to 81 years) would have been a posthumous child born of adultery, which would have led to the murder of his mistress pregnant with him and his works have survived. Having a first child at age 81, while it has one foot in the grave, it is not likely, so I do not think not. No more than I take for granted the "translations" of Wikipedia .

Ten days after his death, the Duke of Paliano did murder his pregnant wife with the pope's approval of his brother, the Cardinal Secretary of State. Under the new Pope Pius IV , they were tried. Cardinal Secretary of State was strangled to Castel Sant'Angelo and the Duke was beheaded. Their accomplices died with them. "

Traditionalists are often poisoned by propaganda anti-Semite, Nietzsche, on the "Enlightenment" and the worst is that they do not even notice it.