On a dispatch posted on yahoo : "On 4 November 2010," the first President of the Court of Appeal of Rennes said that "despite repeated warnings and reports, on its part, the Chancellor had decided not to judge the position of missing the penalty enforcement of Nantes, he was therefore 'not illegitimate for judges to prioritize handling of cases "and that" their choices were not inappropriate '. "
We do not see how this dilemma: either all cases submitted to the judge the application of penalties were all, all, all similar or more serious or the judges who made the choices are irresponsible.
The "Union of the judiciary" should reread the fable of "The Bear and the Amateur Garden" de la Fontaine.
And to think that they are "judges" who write such nonsense! This release is a sign for those who can read.
0 comments:
Post a Comment