About
including religious freedom and occupation of public places (public roads) including a post of "The Hire" seems to condemn all manifestations of religious submission to state authorities.
"427 To prevent or alleviate potential conflicts between the Church and the political community, the legal experience of Church and State has variously defined stable forms of reports and instruments designed to ensure harmonious relations. This experience is an essential reference point for all cases where the state has the claim to invade the scope of the Church, by hindering its free service until the openly persecute or vice versa in Where church organizations do not act properly vis-à-vis the state. "
La Hire deduced that the Church has been free to organize, he said, the processions of" Rogation "(this seems like a shortcut that ignores the implicit authorization municipalities that also participated in these processions in most cases), it should be true today. This reasoning by analogy (the historical term is most uncertain, or probably false) obviously has no value.
should know what we are talking about. That's why I posted a comment that will (maybe, maybe not) published. This comment not only post comments risky "The Hire", but reviews of rampaging Lefebvrists.
"Before writing, it would be better to separate the issues.
one hand the universal reason of man which is binding on all and the other beliefs.
one hand, the occupation of a public place for the movement by a group (be it religious), then the exercise of public worship (in church) and education in family and religious group (in private places).
one hand religious freedom and other implications (possibility for people to choose the Catholic religion as state religion, while respecting the freedom of all that is natural law).
etc..
Such issues are not resolved to 6,4,2, but require extensive studies to very specific conclusions which can not fit in ten lines. Sorry, dear friends. "
I am delighted with my recollection during" Civil rights "to confront him with the statement" Dignitatis Humanae, "to confront the" Syllabus "of confront him with my studies of history of institutions to find their perfect agreement.
My course of "public freedom" distinguished between meetings private, public meetings, rallies and demonstrations on the streets and their various schemes. Dignitatis humanae allows me to remember that religious freedom is not absolute and is subject in its manifestations, and the extent of public order, with state authorities. The "Syllabus" proclaims religious freedom of the Church and people to him. My studies of history of institutions allows me to understand the contracts, based on religious freedom, which existed between the Church and the Western nations (including Filipinos, for example, who are neither white nor European). My experience as a lawyer I can finally better understand the concrete situations.
I'm actually very proud that I can thus make a unique service. To answer my friends' Salon Beige (posters and commentators), I would recommend not to get into explanations on matters beyond their personal cultures. Believer in defending freedom, they handle the "pavement of the bear" against the Church and against France.
0 comments:
Post a Comment