Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Celling Fan Conection

balance of trade with the Forum "Catholic"


all started with a post where I defended the memory of Paul IV. Indeed, the Forum said "Catholic" did not hesitate to publish a translation of a bubble of falsified this pope to move it for anti-Semitic.

This falsification welcomes anti-Catholics who claim Wikipedia as proof that the Church taught that Jews were cursed. And it pleased the anti-Semites who delight in saying that the Church has changed and that the popes of old anti-Semitic were well and preached that Jews were cursed by God because of the Passion.

I demonstrated that it was slander and forgery. And it is used by opposing camps apparently justifies the position of neither the one nor the other.

Immediately I was attacked by a few posters and especially "mullion" that I was "funny" (so I did smile of pity). He deflects the debate on human rights, unanimously condemned this Forum "Catholic", at least in the thread in question (I can not physically read everything).

"mullion" took over one of my old posts where I was indignant that "Blamont" do say things horribly unfair to Moses. I put "Blamont" challenge give biblical references. ("Blamont" claimed that Moses was asked to kill "too dry" [what abominable term] a daughter raped). I'm still waiting references, or rather I did expect more, because the assertion Blamont was indeed a defamation of the memory of Moses.


"(...) in the Old Testament it is stated that a girl who is raped in a way so that nobody heard her cries, must be liquidated as her rapist. So dry. " said the delicate "Blamont. To add "no one can justify his crimes by those of others," thus treating the supporters of Moses criminals.

Mullion and therefore had the ambition to present myself as a forger.

balance of this exchange, if we set aside my personal case: the Forum says "Catholic" continues to publish that Moses "indicated" that a rape victim must be "liquidated" "too dry" if we did not hear his cries (but without giving any biblical reference). Human rights, yet defended by Benedict XVI, still condemned. It remains undisputed, except that the error was anti-Semitic Pope Paul IV and taught that Jews were cursed by God.

All this under the eye off of "moderation".

It is confirmed that this forum is not very Catholic as the vector of defamation of the Church and Judaism, defamation which are common to the far right and far left.

It also confirms that this forum not very Catholic (to put it another way, this "forum fishy") fighting against religious freedom (that is to say against the freedom on which it is based), against freedom of opinion and expression (that is to say, against allowing it to exist).

I am delighted to have clarified the situation.

0 comments:

Post a Comment